|
A Guide to Implementing the Theory of Constraints (TOC) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bold yellow headings are
for major sections. Bold light yellow headings are
for main pages within a section. Normal
light yellow headings are for sub-pages off the main pages. White text headings are content within a
single page. |
|
|
How to
use this site |
|
|
|
Books,
websites & the explicit/tacit Conundrum |
|
|
Inherent
simplicity |
|
|
The
“theory” in Theory of Constraints |
|
|
Convergence
between inherent simplicity & theory |
|
|
A word
on lean (& six sigma) |
|
|
Beware
– international best practice |
|
|
Are we
really crazy? |
|
|
People,
people, people |
|
|
Who
uses this website |
|
|
How to
print |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let’s
start by stopping for a moment |
|
|
|
What is
Theory of Constraints? |
|
|
Yes
but, we’ve seen flavor of the month before |
|
|
A
systems approach |
|
|
Dependency
and variation |
|
|
Finite
capacity |
|
|
Batching |
|
|
What
about detail and dynamic complexity? |
|
|
Thinking
Process |
|
|
Elegance |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increasing
profitability through increased productivity |
|
|
|
Increasing
profitability in low-growth rate periods |
|
|
Types
of constraints |
|
|
Yes, we
get results |
|
|
Multiplier
effect |
|
|
That’s
nice, but we are not-for-profit |
|
|
We
aren’t in manufacturing either |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Tell me
how you will measure me |
|
|
|
Reductionist/local
optima approach |
|
|
So, how
do we measure success here? |
|
|
The P
& Q Analysis |
|
|
Saving
cost alone is not enough |
|
|
How did
we get into this mess? |
|
|
What to
do – rules of engagement |
|
|
Define
the system |
|
|
Define
the goal of the system |
|
|
Define
the necessary conditions |
|
|
Define
the fundamental measurements – T I OE |
|
|
What
about not-for-profit? |
|
|
Systemic/global
optimum approach |
|
|
Hey! This is just contribution margin analysis |
|
|
But we
are still missing something – where is the constraint? |
|
|
Hey! This is just linear programming |
|
|
What
happens if my constraint is in the market? |
|
|
Local
performance measures |
|
|
An
airline analogy |
|
|
Did we
still miss something? |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
The P
& Q question explained |
|
|
|
|
|
P &
Q Answer - Part One |
|
|
|
|
|
P &
Q Answer - Part Two |
|
|
|
|
|
P &
Q Answer - Part Three |
|
|
|
|
|
P &
Q Answer - Part Four |
|
|
|
What
did we discover? |
|
|
|
|
Trying
to do our very best |
|
|
|
Reality
check |
|
|
Some
pre-suppositions |
|
|
Feedback |
|
|
Maps of
reality |
|
|
Maybe
global optimization is contrary to human nature? |
|
|
If
global optimization is so natural – why aren’t we all doing it? |
|
|
If
there is conflict – there is an erroneous assumption |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
The
process of change |
|
|
|
Developing
a focus – our plan of attack |
|
|
How
many weakest lengths in a chain? |
|
|
How
many weakest lengths in a system? |
|
|
Identify |
|
|
Exploit |
|
|
Subordinate |
|
|
Elevate |
|
|
Go back
- inertia |
|
|
The
hourglass analogy |
|
|
Systemic
and systematic |
|
|
Our
erroneous assumption – failure to subordinate |
|
|
Doing
our best – exploitation and subordination |
|
|
Application
to logistical problems |
|
|
Application
to non-logistical problems |
|
|
Tools
for change |
|
|
A
cautionary tale |
|
|
Rates
of improvement |
|
|
Focus
and leverage |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Obtaining
agreement should be easy – right? |
|
|
|
Obtaining
agreement on the problem at hand |
|
|
Obtaining
agreement on the solution to consider |
|
|
Obtaining
agreement on overcoming additional negative outcomes |
|
|
Obtaining
agreement on overcoming obstacles |
|
|
Overkill? |
|
|
Leadership |
|
|
Five
layers of resistance/agreement |
|
|
How
many layers? |
|
|
Resistance
is natural |
|
|
Is this
approach different from others? |
|
|
Frustration |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
How
many layers? |
|
|
|
Five
layers |
|
|
Six
layers - Cohen |
|
|
Six
layers - Smith |
|
|
Nine
layers |
|
|
A
composite 5 layer |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Evaluating
change |
|
|
|
The
context |
|
|
The
fundamental measurements |
|
|
The
see-saw analogy |
|
|
Productivity
and production |
|
|
The
effect of a financial investment |
|
|
See-saws
& equations |
|
|
How do
we express the fulcrum? |
|
|
Determining
throughput at the constraint |
|
|
T/cu
short-hand and other expressions of constraint units |
|
|
Change
just one important thing! |
|
|
Evaluating
change – internal constraints |
|
|
Tactical
and strategic decisions |
|
|
Static
and strategic |
|
|
Evaluating
change – external constraints |
|
|
We
can’t evaluate change without a strategy |
|
|
Subordinating
tactics to the strategy |
|
|
Levers
of control – levers of success |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
Postscript |
|
|
|
|
Financial
navigation |
|
|
(Superseded but still on-line) |
Financial
accounting & management accounting |
|
|
Define
throughput accounting then |
|
|
Horses
for courses |
|
|
Throughput
accounting |
|
|
Small
businesses/large businesses |
|
|
Internal
decision analysis |
|
|
Strategic
and tactical decisions |
|
|
Static
and strategic |
|
|
Subordinating
the tactics to the strategy |
|
|
On-the-fly
conversion from GAAP to throughput accounting |
|
|
Cash
flow |
|
|
Direct
labor as operating expense and strategic implications |
|
|
Limitations
of throughput accounting |
|
|
Constraints
accounting |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Using
Excel Solver to calculate the P & Q answer |
|
|
|
|
|
The
five focusing steps – structured and strategic |
|
|
|
Goldratt’s
original verbalization |
|
|
Newbold’s
verbalization |
|
|
Schragenheim’s
verbalization |
|
|
A
comparison of the re-verbalizations |
|
|
A
synthesis |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Reframing
the situation |
|
|
|
Specific
issues |
|
|
A
catch-22? |
|
|
A
product of the real world |
|
|
Resistance
and reframing |
|
|
Goal
congruence and clarity of purpose |
|
|
Measurements |
|
|
General
issues |
|
|
Management
by Ninjutsu |
|
|
Learning
as organizational knowledge creation |
|
|
Tacit to
explicit – the YF-16 & YF-17 |
|
|
Tacit
to explicit knowledge and the Thinking Process |
|
|
Management
and leadership |
|
|
Mixed
messages |
|
|
Unintentional
punishment of positive actions |
|
|
Unintentional
reward of negative actions |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How do we
manage production processes? |
|
|
|
Job
shops and flow shops |
|
|
Discrete
or non-discrete |
|
|
Flow
shop layout – VATI analysis |
|
|
How can
we schedule these systems? |
|
|
Ford
production system |
|
|
Toyota
production system |
|
|
Synchronous
manufacturing & drum-buffer-rope |
|
|
The
scout troop analogy |
|
|
Protecting
against process variability |
|
|
Synchronous
manufacturing principles |
|
|
What
then of MRP II and ERP? |
|
|
What
about World Class Manufacturing? |
|
|
What about
lean production? |
|
|
And
what of TQM? |
|
|
TQM II |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
A motor
for production |
|
|
|
Our
plan of attack |
|
|
Identify
the system’s constraints |
|
|
Exploit
the system’s constraints |
|
|
Subordination
– protect the system’s constraints |
|
|
An
initial buffer sizing rule |
|
|
Why is
the constraint buffer size and activity determined by time? |
|
|
A
journey through time |
|
|
Subordination
– protect everything else |
|
|
An
alternative initial buffer sizing rule |
|
|
Elevate
the system’s constraints |
|
|
If a
constraint has been broken, go back |
|
|
Some
definitional subtleties |
|
|
Buffer
management – make-to-order |
|
|
Local control
– buffer status |
|
|
That’s
nice – but we have short ropes and we have long ropes |
|
|
Local
control – work order status |
|
|
Local
control – new work order release priority |
|
|
Local
control/global feedback – word order zone 1 buffer penetration |
|
|
Local
control/global feedback – work order performance measures |
|
|
Global
feedback – work order buffer resizing |
|
|
A
market constraint |
|
|
Simplified
drum buffer rope |
|
|
Stock
buffers |
|
|
Why is
the stock buffer size and activity determined by quantity? |
|
|
Transition
to make-to-stock |
|
|
Drum-buffer-rope
& make-to-replenish |
|
|
An
initial finished goods stock buffer sizing rule |
|
|
Buffer
management – make-to-replenish |
|
|
Local planning
in make-to-replenish |
|
|
Local
control – stock buffer status |
|
|
Local
control – stock order status |
|
|
Local
control – new stock order release priority |
|
|
An
alternative stock buffer sizing rule |
|
|
Local control/global
feedback – stock buffer zone 1 penetration |
|
|
Local
control/global feedback – stock buffer performance measurements |
|
|
Global
feedback – stock buffer resizing |
|
|
Drum-buffer-rope
in mixed make-to-order/make-to-replenish |
|
|
The role
of reduced inventory in drum-buffer-rope |
|
|
Raw
material and inwards goods stock buffers |
|
|
But
wait, reality isn’t this simple! |
|
|
Some
changes in definitions |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
More on
buffers |
|
|
|
The
erroneous approach is entrenched |
|
|
The
erroneous approach is base on current experience |
|
|
Buffering
is subordination – buffering is not exploitation |
|
|
|
|
More
definitional subtleties |
|
|
|
|
|
How do
we implement drum buffer rope? |
|
|
|
How do we
identify the constraint? |
|
|
Let’s
collect data and write a report! |
|
|
Wandering
constraints |
|
|
How
then do we exploit the constraint? |
|
|
Schedule
the constraint |
|
|
Shadow
constraints |
|
|
Schedule
discipline |
|
|
Tampering |
|
|
Buffer the
constraint |
|
|
Local
safety argument |
|
|
How
then do we subordinate? |
|
|
Measurements
and communication |
|
|
Speed
wobbles |
|
|
Work-in-process
– a previous indicator of success? |
|
|
Gating
issues |
|
|
Protective
capacity/sprint capacity |
|
|
Road
runner activation/utilization |
|
|
Reluctant
road runners |
|
|
That
traffic light analogy again |
|
|
Batch
sizing |
|
|
Material
handling |
|
|
First-in
first-out (FIFO) discipline |
|
|
Local
performance measures – lateness |
|
|
Local performance
measures – inventory |
|
|
Buffer
management and the buffer manager |
|
|
How do
we elevate? |
|
|
If the
constraint is broken – go back |
|
|
Strategic
constraints |
|
|
A
postscript to implementation details |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Local
safety |
|
|
|
|
|
Why do
we batch? |
|
|
|
A brief
history of batch size issues |
|
|
Manufacturing
lead time and batch size |
|
|
Transfer
batching is natural |
|
|
Yes,
but you don’t understand – we have 3000 standard items |
|
|
The
truck and trailer analogy |
|
|
Batching
discipline |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Quality
will go up! |
|
|
|
Passive
improvement |
|
|
Active
improvement |
|
|
Broader
issues |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Good
intentions are not enough |
|
|
|
Detail
complexity issues |
|
|
Reframing
the argument |
|
|
Dynamic
complexity issues |
|
|
Lieutenant’s
cloud |
|
|
Effective
subordination is the key to effective TOC/DBR implementation! |
|
|
Some
subordination clouds |
|
|
Effective
subordination |
|
|
Other
broader alignment issues |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Lieutenant’s
cloud |
|
|
|
Constructing
the cloud |
|
|
Reading
the cloud back |
|
|
|
|
How much
time is necessary? |
|
|
|
Rapid
solutions |
|
|
But you
don’t understand, they are closing us down in 3-4 months |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crossing
the threshold – external constraints |
|
|
|
Internal
and external causes |
|
|
Causes
internal to the company |
|
|
Causes
external to the company |
|
|
There
are only internal solutions |
|
|
The
holistic approach |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Competitive
advantage – short lead times |
|
|
|
Excessive
queue time/work-in-process |
|
|
Batching
of product |
|
|
Batching
in time |
|
|
Making
money out of people in a rush |
|
|
Making money
out of people with time to spare |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Competitive
advantage – just sufficient stock |
|
|
|
Make-to-stock |
|
|
Excessive
queue time/work-in-process & batching in time |
|
|
Batching
of product |
|
|
Process
batching is an antidote to excessive warehousing |
|
|
Make-to-forecast |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Replenishment
– adding value through the supply chain |
|
|
|
The
motor for supply chain |
|
|
Replenishment
means different things to different people |
|
|
Fixed
re-order quantity with near-instant re-supply – batch lots |
|
|
Fixed
re-order frequency with near-instant re-supply – shipment lots |
|
|
Replenishment
buffers |
|
|
Filling
from the top |
|
|
Initial
sizing of the buffer – with near-instant re-supply |
|
|
Initial
sizing of the buffer – with non-instant re-supply |
|
|
A small
yes but |
|
|
Local
prioritization – the quantity of the re-order |
|
|
Why is
the replenishment buffer size and activity determined by quantity? |
|
|
Local
control / global feedback – buffer management |
|
|
Local
control / global feedback – stock buffer zone 1 penetration |
|
|
Local
control / global feedback – stock buffer performance measurements |
|
|
Local
control – stock buffer status |
|
|
Global
feedback – stock buffer resizing |
|
|
Seasonality |
|
|
Raw
material and inwards goods stock buffers |
|
|
Comparison
with traditional supply chain management |
|
|
Potential
for variable re-order frequency |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
An
important subtlety for manufacturers |
|
|
|
|
|
How can
we characterize distribution? |
|
|
|
Plan of
attack |
|
|
The
beer game! |
|
|
Forecasting |
|
|
The
distribution network |
|
|
Channel
stuffing |
|
|
Dead
stock |
|
|
Out-of-stock |
|
|
Semantics |
|
|
General
solution – distribution with replenishment |
|
|
Local
performance measures |
|
|
Distribution
is not simple replenishment |
|
|
Let’s
think it through |
|
|
What
are the unavoidable outcomes? |
|
|
But
wait, reality isn’t this simple |
|
|
Give us
some examples |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
How can
we characterize marshalling? |
|
|
|
Log
Marshalling |
|
|
Log
Making |
|
|
Plan of
attack |
|
|
The log
marshalling network |
|
|
Semantics |
|
|
We
can’t sell half a tree |
|
|
Mining
as a solution |
|
|
General
solution – log marshalling with replenishment |
|
|
To
super skid or not to super skid |
|
|
Local
performance measures |
|
|
Log
marshalling is not simple replenishment |
|
|
Let’s
think it through |
|
|
What
are the unavoidable outcomes? |
|
|
But
wait, reality isn’t this simple! |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Patient
waiting lists & healthcare |
|
|
|
Plan of
attack |
|
|
The
waiting list network |
|
|
But
demand will increase |
|
|
You
don’t understand we have too many acute patients |
|
|
Cart
before the horse |
|
|
There
is no goal in public health |
|
|
Who
should set the goal then? |
|
|
How do
we set the goal? |
|
|
How
then do we measure progress towards the goal? |
|
|
Yes
but, the Government already uses maximum patient wait times |
|
|
Broader
issues |
|
|
A
critical erroneous assumption |
|
|
Semantics |
|
|
General
solution – part 1: intervention and drum-buffer-rope |
|
|
General
solution – part 2: patient waiting lists and replenishment |
|
|
Let’s
put it all together |
|
|
Local
performance measures |
|
|
Yes
but, do we do tonsillectomies or hip operations? |
|
|
Patient
waiting lists are not simple replenishment |
|
|
Let’s
think it through |
|
|
What
are the unavoidable outcomes? |
|
|
But
wait, reality isn’t this simple! |
|
|
Gives
us some examples |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The principle
of leverage |
|
|
|
The
Thinking Process |
|
|
Verbalizing
intuition |
|
|
Structured
nemawashi |
|
|
Cause
and effect |
|
|
Which
tool for which occasion? |
|
|
Proof-reading
trees |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Categories
of legitimate reservation |
|
|
|
Clarity
reservation |
|
|
Entity
existence reservation |
|
|
Causality
existence reservation |
|
|
Predicted
effect existence reservation |
|
|
Insufficient
cause reservation |
|
|
Additional
cause reservation |
|
|
Tautology |
|
|
|
|
Undesirable
effects & core problems |
|
|
|
The
five whys |
|
|
Feedback |
|
|
Core
problem or core conflict |
|
|
|
|
How do
we build a current reality tree? |
|
|
|
|
|
Clouds
and silver linings |
|
|
|
Countermeasures
and injections |
|
|
The
cloud and the OODA loop |
|
|
Don’t
think outside of the box – break the box |
|
|
How do
we build a cloud? |
|
|
|
|
Why the
OODA Loop? |
|
|
|
OODA is
not a loop! |
|
|
Feedback |
|
|
The big
“O” – Orientation |
|
|
Implicit
guidance and control |
|
|
Attrition
warfare/maneuver warfare |
|
|
Cost
world/throughput world |
|
|
Decision
Loops |
|
|
Abduction |
|
|
Remember
the 5th Step? |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Breaking
the box |
|
|
|
|
|
Common
clouds |
|
|
|
Efrat’s
cloud |
|
|
|
|
The
communication current reality tree |
|
|
|
3 Cloud
method |
|
|
How do
we build it? |
|
|
|
|
Future
expectations |
|
|
|
Feedback |
|
|
|
|
How do
we build a future reality tree? |
|
|
|
|
|
We
didn’t intend that to happen |
|
|
|
How do
we trim a branch? |
|
|
|
|
Overcoming
obstacles |
|
|
|
How do
we build a pre-requisite tree? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well,
just what is strategy? |
|
|
|
The
articulated truck analogy |
|
|
Two
ways to skin a cat |
|
|
Holistic
approach |
|
|
Constraint
Management Model for Strategy |
|
|
Levers
of control |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Boyd
meets Goldratt |
|
|
|
Constraint
Management Model for Strategy |
|
|
Define
the paradigm |
|
|
Analyze
the mismatches |
|
|
Create
a transformation |
|
|
Design
the future |
|
|
Plan
the future |
|
|
Deploy
the strategy |
|
|
Review
the strategy |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
All
singing from the same systemic song sheet |
|
|
|
The
holistic approach is not… |
|
|
The
holistic approach is … |
|
|
Tool
Sets |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Is
Theory of Constraints a strategy? |
|
|
|
Are the
logistical applications of Theory of Constraints strategy? |
|
|
Are the
non-logistical applications of Theory of Constraints strategy? |
|
|
Pulling
it altogether - subordination |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Redundancy
and variety |
|
|
|
Redundancy
and variety are flexibility |
|
|
Flexibility
is survival |
|
|
Survival
is success |
|
|
|
|
That
“P” word – paradigm |
|
|
|
Let’s
characterize our two approaches |
|
|
Developmental
sequences of the various methodologies |
|
|
Are our
approaches indeed paradigms? |
|
|
Awareness
of anomaly |
|
|
Mopping-up
operations |
|
|
Intolerance
of other theories |
|
|
Commitment |
|
|
Resistance
& assurance of the older paradigm |
|
|
Yes,
paradigms they are |
|
|
Let’s
then characterize the paradigms |
|
|
What is
the fundamental driver for Scientific Management? |
|
|
What is
the fundamental driver for Theory of Constraints? |
|
|
Mismatch |
|
|
Let’s
then characterize the differences |
|
|
Same
words – different worlds – different meanings |
|
|
Goldratt
& Pareto |
|
|
Paradigms
& detail/dynamic complexity |
|
|
Quality
and timeliness are necessary conditions |
|
|
Subordination
is also a necessary condition |
|
|
Failure
to fulfill necessary conditions |
|
|
Exploitation
and subordination |
|
|
Subordination
is even more fundamental still |
|
|
All
doing our best – according to our map of reality |
|
|
Tactical
and strategic advantage |
|
|
Paradigms
and layers of resistance |
|
|
Paradigms – development, propagation, & transferal |
|
|
Breaking
paradigms – a word on simple simulations |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
A
Japanese perspective – an explanation |
|
|
|
Pumpkin
pies & carrot cakes |
|
|
Goals
& necessary conditions |
|
|
The
goal – a North American perspective |
|
|
The
goal – a Japanese perspective |
|
|
What
about the customer? |
|
|
Yes but
– the goal must be open-ended |
|
|
Yes but
– the owners set the goal |
|
|
Which
one is correct? |
|
|
The
problem with the North American perspective |
|
|
The
problem with the Japanese perspective |
|
|
Cheaper
labor in China |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Sales
constraints and Mafia Offers |
|
|
|
The
sales model |
|
|
Implied
needs/explicit needs |
|
|
Small Sales |
|
|
Buyers
are not liars |
|
|
Large
sales – the SPIN selling model |
|
|
Quincy’s
rule |
|
|
Insufficiency
of the SPIN model |
|
|
Reservations
and obstacles |
|
|
Detail
complexity sales within a paradigm |
|
|
Detail
complexity sales across paradigms |
|
|
Mafia
Offers |
|
|
Mafia
Offers and sales across paradigms |
|
|
Theory
of Constraints as a sales constraint to itself |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projects,
projects, projects ... |
|
|
|
A
definition of sorts |
|
|
Outline |
|
|
|
|
Comparing
safety in production & projects |
|
|
|
A
project is an “A” plant tipped on its side |
|
|
Touch
time and variability in projects |
|
|
Variability
and dependent events |
|
|
Gains
are lost – projects never finish early |
|
|
Losses
are gained – projects always finish late |
|
|
More
variability – contingent dependency and uncertainty |
|
|
More
variability – novelty and uncertainty |
|
|
More
variability – resource availability and uncertainty |
|
|
Touch
time and uncertainty |
|
|
Uncertainty
and dependent events |
|
|
Safety
& task duration estimates |
|
|
Heuristics
– task & buffer sizing rules |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
References |
|
|
|
|
Critical
chain project management – a performance engine for projects |
|
|
|
Our
plan of attack |
|
|
Identify |
|
|
Exploit |
|
|
Subordination
– protect the system’s constraints |
|
|
Subordination
– protect everything else |
|
|
Subordination
– an aside on the effect of bad-multi-tasking |
|
|
A
journey through time |
|
|
Buffer
management – critical chain |
|
|
Local
control – buffer status |
|
|
Local
control/global feedback – project performance measures |
|
|
Global
feedback – task resizing |
|
|
Elevate
the system’s constraints |
|
|
If a
constraint has been broken, go back |
|
|
Trust |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
References |
|
|
|
|
A
shorter critical chain |
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction |
|
|
|
The
good, the bad, and the ugly |
|
|
Basic
project plans |
|
|
Task
resourcing |
|
|
Reduce
multi-tasking |
|
|
Freeze,
reduce, maintain |
|
|
Alternative
one – pace the introduction of new projects |
|
|
Alternative
two – stagger the introduction of new projects |
|
|
Failure
to reduce the number of projects |
|
|
Local
efficiency measurement |
|
|
An
alternative buffer status graph |
|
|
Alternative
initial task sizing rules |
|
|
Rewarding
incorrect behaviour |
|
|
Punishing
correct behaviour |
|
|
Multi-tasking
& matrix organizations |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
References |
|
|
|
|
Multi-Project
Drums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caring
about healthcare |
|
|
|
We’ve
been here before – lean & healthcare |
|
|
What can
we do about it? |
|
|
Rate
limiting steps |
|
|
Focus –
Theory of Constraints and healthcare |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
References |
|
|
|
|
Accident
& Emergency |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Acute
Surgery |
|
|
|
|
|
Medical/Surgical
Nursing |
|
|
|
|
|
Logic
Matters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes,
there is more |
|
|
|
Postscript |
|
|
|
|
Dr
Deming |
|
|
|
|
|
Taylor
& Social Darwinism |
|
|
|
|
|
Toyota,
Kaizen, Lean |
|
|
|
|
|
Fantasy,
Hierarchy, & Groups |
|
|
|
|
|
Fundamental
Cloud |
|
|
|
|
|
Paradox
Of Systemism |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What’s
the next step |
|
|
|
Plan A
– do it yourself |
|
|
Plan B
– do it yourself with facilitation |
|
|
Plan C –
do it yourself with viable vision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome |
|
|
|
Nothing
stands still |
|
|
Contact
me |
|
|
|
|
The
offer |
|
|
|
The
reality of constraints |
|
|
How to
out-Toyota Toyota |
|
|
The
prequel |
|
|
The
strategy |
|
|
A
generic pre-requisite |
|
|
What
about receivership/restructuring |
|
|
Initiating
change |
|
|
Yes but
… |
|
|
The
prequel then |
|
|
|
|
A chain
is a chain is a chain |
|
|
|
Breaking
the bind that stops us from saying “no” |
|
|
Breaking
the bind that stops us from saying “yes” |
|
|
The
classic balanced dice game |
|
|
“Advanced”
unbalanced dice simulations |
|
|
A
fundamental cloud |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|